metal + hardcore
pop punk + alt-rock
indie spins


Universal Music Eyes Cut Of iPod Sales

LOS ANGELES – Universal Music Group CEO Doug Morris resents that
MTV and other cable music channels built multibillion-dollar businesses
around videos given away by record companies anxious to promote their

So when he saw his own grandson watching 50 Cent’s “In Da Club” video
on Yahoo, it got him asking: “How much are we getting paid for that?”

The answer – nothing – led Morris to pull all of Universal’s videos
from the giant Web portal until it agreed to a licensing deal in 2005.

He wrangled similar arrangements from Time Warner Inc.’s AOL and other
Internet portals as part of his unrelenting campaign to generate more
revenue for Universal.

Among Morris’ most recent targets were Google Inc.’s YouTube, Microsoft Corp. and News Corp.’s MySpace.

“As the largest music company, he’s got an interesting hand of cards,” said Mike McGuire, a technology analyst for Gartner Inc.

“He’s playing them pretty adamantly and pretty hard.”

Universal, a division of French telecommunications giant Vivendi SA,
accounted for about 31 percent of total U.S. album sales in 2006,
according to Nielsen SoundScan. The company is home to artists such as
U2, Kanye West and Mariah Carey.

Morris’ get-paid mantra has cast him as a champion in the eyes of many
people in the industry – and a bully among others – at a time when
music companies are trying to stem losses from declining compact disc
sales and widespread online piracy.

With online music and video becoming the digital content of choice for
iPods, mobile phones and Web sites of every stripe, the recording
industry is scrambling to find ways to cash in as much as possible.

“I’m no tough guy,” said Morris, 67, a former songwriter and performer
who is entering his 12th year as chairman and chief executive of
Universal Music.

“It’s just the position you get put in, where you’re either going to
succumb to it, and say, ’fine, that’s OK, yeah, put your advertisements
next to our videos, we don’t care,’ or you’re going to say ’hey, this
isn’t fair.’

“I’m going to be a kamikaze pilot until that’s all straightened out,” he said.

Other recording companies have yet to follow Universal’s hard-line
lead, particularly in suing online video and social networking sites.
They appear happy to let Morris carry the fight through lawsuits and
other measures.

In his tussle with YouTube, Morris called the site a hub for pirated
music videos and negotiated a licensing deal that landed Universal and
other labels small stakes in the company just before it was acquired by
Google for $1.76 billion last year.

Morris has already suggested, albeit guardedly, that his next target
will be iPod-maker and No. 1 online music retailer Apple Inc. With
Apple’s licensing deal to sell Universal music on iTunes set to expire
in May, Morris said, “there might be other ways to get paid.”

Speculation in the industry is that he’ll seek a slice of iPod sales. Apple declined comment.

Universal’s upcoming negotiations with Apple could set the tone for the
rest of the recording industry. But Morris says he doesn’t know if he’s
prepared to pull Universal’s music from iTunes to get a cut of iPod

“I wouldn’t want to draw a line in the sand,” he said.

Last fall, Morris threatened not to license Universal music to
Microsoft just days before it was scheduled to launch its own online
music store and its Zune digital music player. In response, the
software company coughed up a royalty of just over a dollar for every
Zune sold and paid a licensing fee for the right to sell Universal

Microsoft extended the same terms to other labels, a move that led
Edgar Bronfman Jr., chairman and CEO of Warner Music Group, to tell
Wall Street analysts that it took a strong stand by the industry leader
to make the deal happen.

Morris isn’t sure he is cut out for the role of enforcer but believes he has no choice.

“The truth is that I’m the most unlikely candidate because I don’t like being in the middle of the sandwich,” he said.

Morris broke into the music business as a performer and songwriter in
the late 1950s. His writing credits include the Chiffons’ sugary 1966
chart-topper Sweet Talkin’ Guy.

He launched his own label then sold it in 1978 to Warner Music’s
Atlantic Records. Two years later, he became president of Atlantic.

As a record executive with roots in songwriting and performing, Morris
was seen as an ally to artists and creative executives. But he could
also come down hard on artists who weren’t living up to expectations.

Among the bands Morris worked with was INXS. When their fourth album
took a stylistic detour and sales lagged in America, the displeased
Morris had a talk with Chris Murphy, then the manager of the Australian

“He definitely showed his inner personality and was pretty wild with me. He was just very aggressive,” Murphy said.

Still, months later, when Murphy asked Morris for support in moving the
band from a smaller label to Atlantic, Morris agreed without imposing
any stylistic demands, Murphy recalled.

In the mid-1990s, Morris vaulted to president and chief operating
officer of Warner Music U.S. – the parent company of Atlantic – but was
soon ousted in a clash with corporate management with its then-parent
company, Time Warner.

“It was a very difficult period,” Morris recalled. “You can’t live in a
place for 17 years and then not be there the next moment and have to
start again.”

He went on to form a joint venture with MCA Music Entertainment Group
and was tapped in 1995 to be chief executive of the company, which was
renamed Universal Music Group.

“He put that company together, and he’s kept it together despite all
the changes in ownership and the changes in technology,” said Danny
Goldberg, a former chairman of Warner Bros. Records who worked for
Morris in the early 1990s.

Goldberg said Morris has remained atop the volatile industry in large part because of his realistic, forward-thinking vision.

“He’s a survivor,” Goldberg said. “No one ever got rich betting against Doug Morris.”

We utilize cookie technology to collect data regarding the number of visits a person has made to our site. This data is stored in aggregate form and is in no way singled out in an individual file. This information allows us to know what pages/sites are of interest to our users and what pages/sites may be of less interest. See more